Every S&P 500 constituent run through a mechanical Senior Equity Research Analyst screen — 10-year fade DCF (normalized capex, true debt-weighted WACC) blended 50/50 with sub-industry peer comps. Auto-generated, not analyst-reviewed. Last full refresh: 2026-09-13 15:41 UTC.
| Ticker | Sector | Rating | Price | 12M PT | Upside | Explainer |
|---|
Methodology: FCF built bottom-up from EBITDA × (1-tax) − normalized capex (3yr-average capex/revenue), true WACC = (E/V)×Ke + (D/V)×Kd×(1-tax) using actual market cap/debt weights, 10-year explicit/fade window (growth glides to 2.5% terminal over years 6–10). Stage-1 growth is the mechanical 3yr revenue CAGR, floored at 2.5%, with an automatic override to EBITDA-CAGR-based growth when revenue and EBITDA have moved in opposite directions. Financials, Real Estate, and Utilities use a net-income FCFE variant (discounted at cost of equity) instead of the EBITDA/capex build, per standard convention for regulated/dividend-discount-style sectors. Peer comps use forward P/E and EV/EBITDA averaged within each GICS sub-industry (falling back to sector-level if the sub-industry has <2 peers with data), with the peer/own multiple ratio clamped to [0.4x, 2.5x] to prevent a single distorted multiple from dominating. Extreme outputs are winsorized at +150%/−90% upside. *Skipped tickers had insufficient or economically unusable data (e.g. negative trailing earnings across the board) for either variant.
100-word-style explainers are template-generated from the computed numbers, not analyst-written prose — treat this as a mechanical screen for triage, not investment research. Financials sourced via yfinance; peer multiples via yfinance .info (SEC EDGAR compare_companies not used). Full methodology and the 10-name hand-reviewed pilot: see equity_research/ reports. Not investment advice.