To: FOMC Policy Committee / Market Strategy Desk
From: Senior Economist & Central Bank Strategist
Date: May 7, 2025
Subject: Comparative Analysis of FOMC Monetary Policy Statements (March vs. May 2025)
Although swings in net exports have affected the data, recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. The unemployment rate has stabilized at a low level in recent months, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated.
The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. Uncertainty ~~around~~ about the economic outlook has increased further. The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate and judges that the risks of higher unemployment and higher inflation have risen.
In support of its goals, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 4-1/4 to 4-1/2 percent. In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities. ~~Beginning in April, the Committee will slow the pace of decline of its securities holdings by reducing the monthly redemption cap on Treasury securities from $25 billion to $5 billion. The Committee will maintain the monthly redemption cap on agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities at $35 billion.~~ The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective.
In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committee's goals. The Committee's assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.
Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Michael S. Barr; Michelle W. Bowman; Susan M. Collins; Lisa D. Cook; Austan D. Goolsbee; Philip N. Jefferson; Neel Kashkari; Adriana D. Kugler; Alberto G. Musalem; and Christopher J. Waller. Neel Kashkari voted as an alternate member at this meeting. ~~Voting against this action was Christopher J. Waller, who supported no change for the federal funds target range but preferred to continue the current pace of decline in securities holdings.~~
For media inquiries, please email [email protected] or call 202-452-2955.
Implementation Note issued May 7, 2025
| Removed | Added | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| (Start of sentence) | "Although swings in net exports have affected the data..." | Data Noise: The Fed is qualifying GDP/growth data, suggesting that "solid" growth may be skewed by trade volatility rather than domestic strength. |
| "around" | "about... increased further" | Escalating Uncertainty: The shift from "increased" to "increased further" signals a deteriorating confidence in the economic forecast. |
| (End of sentence) | "...and judges that the risks of higher unemployment and higher inflation have risen." | Dual-Threat Risk: This is a critical admission. The Committee is now explicitly flagging a "stagflationary" risk profile (simultaneous rise in inflation and unemployment). |
| Specifics on April taper slowdown (redemption caps) | (Removed) | Policy Normalization: The specific guidance on slowing the balance sheet runoff has been removed, likely because the action was implemented in April and is now the baseline. |
| Christopher Waller's dissent | Christopher Waller (Voting for) | Internal Consensus: The Committee has reached a consensus on the pace of balance sheet reduction, removing the previous internal friction. |
The characterization of inflation as "somewhat elevated" remains unchanged, suggesting the baseline trend hasn't shifted. However, the addition of the phrase "risks of... higher inflation have risen" is a significant hawkish pivot. It suggests that while current inflation is stable, the Committee sees new catalysts that could push it upward again.
The Committee maintains that growth is "solid" and labor markets "remain solid." However, the qualifier regarding "swings in net exports" suggests the Fed is skeptical of the headline growth numbers. More alarmingly, the explicit mention that "risks of higher unemployment... have risen" indicates a growing concern that the labor market may be closer to a tipping point than previously acknowledged.
The core guidance remains data-dependent ("carefully assess incoming data"). However, the shift from "uncertainty has increased" to "increased further" combined with the admission of rising risks to both mandates suggests the Committee is preparing the markets for potential volatility. They are no longer just "attentive" to risks; they are actively judging those risks to be increasing.
Verdict: Anxious Neutral (Leaning Hawkish)
While the Committee maintained the federal funds rate, the tone has shifted from "cautious" to "anxious." The most striking change is the explicit acknowledgement that risks to both sides of the dual mandate have risen simultaneously. This is a classic "worst-of-both-worlds" signal. By flagging rising inflation risks alongside rising unemployment risks, the Fed is signaling that it is trapped in a policy dilemma. The removal of the dissent from Governor Waller suggests a unified front, but the text reveals a Committee that is increasingly worried about the stability of the economic outlook. The tone is not overtly hawkish (as they didn't signal a hike), but it is "hawkish" in its refusal to signal any imminent easing despite the rising unemployment risk.